No reader payment required
Editorial accessible free. No paywalls. No required signups. Cost borne by retailer marketing budgets.
How Comparees makes money, in plain language. Every affiliate relationship documented. Every revenue stream disclosed. Why our editorial recommendations aren't influenced by commissions, and the firm structural separation between editorial work and commerce.
Comparees makes money primarily through affiliate commissions: when you click a link to a retailer like Amazon or Flipkart or a brand-direct site, and you make a purchase, we receive a small commission from the retailer. You pay nothing extra; the commission comes out of the retailer's margin. The crucial structural fact: our editorial team determines what to recommend based on our published methodology, and the affiliate links are added afterward to whatever was recommended. Brands cannot pay to be ranked higher, included in articles, or favorably reviewed. We've turned down such offers from major brands across all 11 categories we cover. The money comes from purchases that happened anyway; the editorial determines what to recommend, not the other way around.
You pay nothing extra. Commissions come from retailer margin, not your pocket. Same price whether you use our links or not.
Zero brand-paid coverage. Methodology determines rankings. Affiliate links added after editorial decisions, never before.
Every affiliate link disclosed. Every relationship documented. Every revenue stream explained transparently on this page.
Recommendations determine links. Not the other way around. Best product wins, regardless of commission rate.
Affiliate links are URLs that contain a tracking parameter identifying Comparees as the source of a visitor. When you click an affiliate link and the destination retailer can attribute your visit (and any subsequent purchase) back to Comparees, we may earn a small commission from that retailer if you complete a purchase within a tracking window.
| Aspect | Regular link | Affiliate link |
|---|---|---|
| Looks the same? | Yes | Yes (some have tracking params) |
| Works the same? | Yes | Yes — same destination |
| Costs you more? | No | No — same price |
| Tracks purchases? | No | Yes — for commission attribution |
| Earns us money? | No | Yes — if you buy something |
| Required disclosure? | No | Yes — by law |
When you make an online purchase, the retailer pays a small percentage of the transaction to whoever referred you. If you arrived via Comparees, that's us. If you arrived via Google search, no one earns it. If you went directly to the retailer, no one earns it. The price you pay is identical in all cases. What's actually happening is a retailer marketing budget allocation, not a hidden charge to you.
Affiliate commissions are not added to your purchase price. They come from the retailer's existing marketing budget — money the retailer was going to spend on customer acquisition anyway. Whether spent on Google ads, social media, or affiliate publishers like us, it's part of retailers' standard marketing cost structure.
You access editorial content freely — no paywall, no signup, no obligation.
If a recommendation interests you, you follow the link to the retailer.
You decide whether to buy. Standard retailer pricing, no markup.
If purchased within tracking window, retailer pays us a small commission.
While affiliate commissions are our primary revenue, we have additional streams documented in our Advertise page:
The revenue from affiliate commissions and other sources funds:
Comparees participates in affiliate programs with a range of retailers and brands. Here's the complete list, organized by category:
We participate in direct affiliate programs with brands across multiple categories:
We also use affiliate networks that aggregate multiple brands:
For the most current and complete list of all affiliate relationships, contact us at legal@comparees.com. This list is updated quarterly as we add or end affiliate relationships. We don't hide any relationships — full disclosure on request, always.
The most important thing to understand about our model: editorial decisions and affiliate links are made by different people at different times. Our editorial team — Priya Mehta (Appliances/Privacy), Arjun Kapoor (Tech/Style), Vikram T. (Lifestyle/Home Tech), Rohan Sharma (Cybersecurity/Sport), Neha Verma (Software/Subscriptions), and Rohan Singh (Travel) — applies our published methodology to research, test, and rank products. They don't see affiliate commission rates when making editorial decisions. Affiliate links are added later by our partnership team after editorial decisions are finalized.
Several practical implications worth understanding:
Concrete examples from our recent coverage:
The structural separation between editorial and commerce isn't perfect — humans are involved at every stage, and complete independence is impossible to fully prove. What we can do is build the structure to make influence as hard as possible, document our methodology publicly, and welcome scrutiny when we appear to fail the test. Our published methodology is the accountability mechanism that lets readers verify our practices.
Affiliate links on Comparees are identified in several ways to ensure you can distinguish them from regular links:
Every article on Comparees includes a disclosure notice indicating that some links may earn commission. This typically appears:
You can identify affiliate links through several technical methods:
?tag=, ?ref=, or redirect through affiliate networksamzn.to, fkrt.cc, cuelinks.com, or similar are typically affiliate linksCertain section types on Comparees are particularly likely to contain affiliate links:
When multiple retailers carry a product we recommend, we typically link to:
Sometimes our reader-first link choice means we link to retailers with lower commission rates than alternatives. This is the structural commitment we make: best for readers, not best for our bottom line. Examples from past coverage:
These are absolute commitments. No partnership budget, no relationship length, no offer combination will move us across these lines:
These firm boundaries are structural to our business model. The moment we cross any of these lines, the value of our editorial work to readers disappears. Without trustworthy editorial, we have nothing to monetize through affiliate commissions. The integrity isn't just ethical — it's commercial. Our reputation among readers is our most valuable asset, and these commitments protect it.
| Category | Typical rate | Tracking window |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon India | 1-10% (varies by category) | 24 hours |
| Flipkart | 1-12% (varies by category) | 30 days |
| Apparel brands | 6-15% | 30-60 days |
| Footwear brands | 5-12% | 30 days |
| Appliances | 2-8% | 30 days |
| SaaS subscriptions | 20-40% (first month) or 8-15% recurring | 30-90 days |
| Hotels | 3-7% of booking value | 30 days |
| Flights | flat fee per booking or 0.5-2% | 24-48 hours |
"Tracking window" refers to how long after your click we can earn commission. Practical implications:
Several scenarios worth understanding:
This creates an interesting structural fact: our financial incentive isn't to convince you to buy specific products. It's to drive qualified traffic to retailers we have relationships with. Whether you buy what we recommended or something else, the commission comes through. This further reduces our incentive to recommend specific products for commission reasons — we benefit either way as long as you find our content useful enough to click through to retailers.
Commissions aren't always permanent. They can be reversed when:
You have complete right to use Comparees content without ever using affiliate links. How to use Comparees without affiliate links:
If you find our editorial work valuable and want to support continued operation, you can:
You always retain the right to:
When you click an affiliate link:
See our Privacy Policy for complete details on data handling.
As an India-headquartered publication, we comply with the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) code, particularly the influencer marketing guidelines requiring disclosure of material connections to brands. Our affiliate relationships and partnership arrangements are disclosed in accordance with these guidelines.
While we're headquartered in India, our content reaches a global audience including significant US readership. We comply with the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) endorsement guidelines, which require clear disclosure of:
For European Union and United Kingdom readers, we comply with:
Practical compliance measures include:
If you believe our disclosure practices fall short of legal requirements or our own commitments:
Comparees Editorial & Compliance
Bandra West, Mumbai
Maharashtra, India · 400050
For complete context on how Comparees operates:
The current list of brands and retailers Comparees has affiliate relationships with, organized by category. Updated quarterly. For the most current list, contact legal@comparees.com.
The clearest possible summary of our affiliate practices and editorial commitments. Full details in the disclosure sections above.
These practices form the foundation of our affiliate model. They're documented here for accountability and consistent application across all editorial work.
These are absolute commitments. No payment, no relationship length, no offer combination will move us across these lines. Our reputation depends on them.
Beyond firm boundaries, these are positive commitments we make to readers. Each is a specific practice we maintain consistently.
Every affiliate relationship documented. Every revenue stream explained. Quarterly partner list updates. No hidden relationships, ever.
Methodology before commerce. Editors don't see commission rates when deciding rankings. Affiliate links added after editorial decisions.
We link to the best retailer for readers, not the highest commission. Lower commission but better fit often wins our link choice.
Zero brands have paid for rankings. We've turned down offers from major brands. The reputation built on this is non-negotiable.
Affiliate clicks don't share your identity with us. We get aggregate referral data only. Reader data never sold to affiliate partners.
Affiliate model means no paywalls. No required signups. No required subscriptions. Editorial accessible to anyone, anytime.
We publish critical findings about affiliate partners. Quality issues, customer service failures, security vulnerabilities — all reported honestly.
FTC, ASCI, and ASA compliant. Disclosure practices reviewed quarterly. Compliance violations get prompt correction.
No AI-generated review content for affiliate purposes. Every recommendation by a named editor with documented expertise. Real evaluations only.
The affiliate model gets criticized when publications use it dishonestly — pretending to recommend products independently while actually being paid to push specific items. Used honestly, the affiliate model is remarkably aligned with reader interests.
Compare to traditional models: subscription publications need you to pay regardless of content quality; ad-supported publications need clicks regardless of editorial value; sponsored content publications need brands to pay for coverage. The affiliate model only pays when we recommend something readers actually want to buy — incentivizing us to recommend genuinely useful products.
Editorial accessible free. No paywalls. No required signups. Cost borne by retailer marketing budgets.
We earn only when readers find recommendations useful enough to buy. Reader benefit drives our revenue.
Methodology determines recommendations. Affiliate links added after editorial decisions, not before.
Revenue funds editorial team, product testing, research infrastructure. Long-term independent journalism.
Better recommendations generate more conversions long-term. Trust compounds; manipulation destroys.
Specific transparency on revenue composition. These percentages are updated annually in our transparency report. Our complete commitment: every revenue stream documented, every relationship disclosed, every potential conflict surfaced for reader awareness.
For our complete trust framework, see our Methodology page. For partnership opportunities, see Advertise. For privacy practices, see Privacy Policy.
Primary revenue source. Earned only when readers purchase through our links. Editorial determines recommendations, affiliate adds links to what was recommended.
Clearly labeled sponsor content in our Compare Brief newsletter. Brand mentions kept distinct from editorial. Reader emails never shared with sponsors.
Custom research collaborations, strategic partnerships, reader support. All structured to maintain editorial independence per our methodology.
Common questions readers ask about our affiliate practices, and the practical answers most people actually want.
?tag=, ?ref=, or pass through affiliate networks. 2) Common affiliate domains: links going through amzn.to, fkrt.cc, cuelinks.com, or shrsl.com are typically affiliate links. 3) Browser developer tools: right-click any link and "inspect" to see the full URL structure. 4) Privacy extensions: tools like uBlock Origin and Privacy Badger can identify and optionally block affiliate tracking. Context clues that suggest affiliate links: 1) "Visit [Brand]" buttons in product cards. 2) "Where to buy" sections. 3) Product comparison tables with retailer columns. 4) Deal alerts and price drop notifications. 5) Newsletter product mentions with direct retailer links. Context clues that suggest non-affiliate links: 1) Links to brand history articles or company information pages. 2) Links to news sources or research papers. 3) Links to government sites or industry organizations. 4) Links to our own pages on Comparees. 5) Links to tools or services we don't have affiliate relationships with. The general rule: if a link leads to a retailer or brand where you could buy something, it's probably an affiliate link. If it leads to informational content or our internal pages, it probably isn't. When in doubt: email editorial@comparees.com about a specific link and we'll tell you whether it's an affiliate link or not.Affiliate questions, compliance concerns, methodology challenges, or general curiosity about how we work — email legal@comparees.com for disclosure questions or editorial@comparees.com for specific article concerns. Real humans, real responses.